12/29/2008

2008中國大陸「反書」大搜捕



討共文學














黑信封(長篇小說)
流氓的歸來 (回憶錄)
論小醜(評論集)

作者 / 羅馬尼亞 Norman Manea
吉林出版集團


布羅茨基談話錄

東方出版社













秋之蠅/庫里洛夫事件

作者 / 法國 Irene Nemirovsky
人民文學出版社












衣缽

作者 / 尤鳳偉
花城出版社















史著:蘇聯.冷戰


帝國的消亡
-- 當代俄羅斯的教訓


作者 / 俄國 蓋達爾
社會科學文獻出版社











克格勃與政權
-- 克格勃第一副主席的回憶


作者 / 蘇聯 博布科夫
東方出版社











哈爾濱檔案
The Harbin Files

作者 / 澳洲 穆斯塔芬
中華書局











俄羅斯史

作者 / 美國 Riasanovsky,N.V. ,Steniberg,M.D.
上海人民出版社













五十年傷痕
-- 美國的冷戰曆史觀與世界


作者 / 美國 Derek Leebaert
上海三聯書店













史著:中共.中國


國民黨的「聯共」與「反共」

作者 / 楊奎松
社會科學文獻出版社













找尋真實的蔣介石
-- 蔣介石日記解讀


作者 / 楊天石
山西人民出版社


























(傅高義中國研究譯叢)
共產主義下的廣州 -- 一個省會的規劃與政治
先行一步 -- 改革中的廣東

作者 / 傅高義
廣東人民出版社


















交鋒三十年 -- 改革開放四次大爭論親歷記
作者 / 馬立誠
江蘇人民出版社

淩志軍文集
湖北人民出版社


中國的大轉型
-- 從發展政治學看中國變革


作者 / 蕭功秦
新星出版社














反共剖共論著


社會主義
SOCIALISM

作者 / Ludwig von Mises
中國社會科學出版社











自我耗竭式演進
-- 政黨/國家體制的模型與驗證

Self-consuming Evolutions

作者 / 匈牙利 Maria Csanadi
中央編譯出版社










極權主義的起源
The Origins Of Totalitarianism

作者 / Hannah Arendt
三聯書店











自由選擇
Free to Choose

作者 / Milton Friedman,Rose Friedman
機械工業出版社











狂熱份子
-- 碼頭工人哲學家的沉思錄

The True Believer

作者 / 美國 Eric Hoffer
廣西師範大學出版社













民主化研究


無須資本家打造資本主義
-- 後共產主義中歐的階級形成和精英鬥爭

Making Capitalism without Capitalists

作者 / Gil Eyal,Ivan Szelenyi,Eleanor R. Townsley,Eleanor Townsley
社會科學文獻出版社










民主轉型與鞏固的問題
-- 南歐、南美和後共產主義歐洲

Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation

作者 / 美國 Juan J. Linz,Alfred Stepan
浙江人民出版社










民主轉型的政治經濟分析
The Political Economy Of Democratic Transitions

作者 / 美國 Stephan Haggard,Robert R.Kaufmans
社會科學文獻出版社











歐洲的抗爭與民主(1650-2000)
Contention and Democracy in Europe, 1650-2000

作者 / 美國 Charles Tilly
上海人民出版社











從威權到民主
-- 可持續發展的政治經濟學


主编 / 青木昌彦、吴敬琏
中信出版社














傳媒.知識界


傳媒的四種理論
Four Theories of the Press

作者 / 美國 Fred S. Siebert,Theodore Peterson,Wilbur Schramm
中國人民大學出版社











中國新聞輿論史

作者 / 林語堂
中國人民大學出版社












舊聞記者

作者 / 錢鋼
上海書店













問學諫往錄

作者 / 蕭公權
黃山書社











明報月刊.大家大講堂

新星出版社













中國文學史VII
-- 二十世紀中國文學史


主編 / 德國 顧彬
復旦大學出版社














禁毀作家


















天堂沉默了半小時 -- 影視中的信仰與人生
作者 / 王怡
江西人民出版社

自由的崛起
作者 / 美國 Douglas F.Kelly 譯者 / 王怡
江西人民出版社


民主二十講(大家西學)

主編 / 劉軍寧
中國青年出版社












青燈

作者 / 北島
江蘇文藝出版社

12/28/2008

世間再無亨廷頓




花某一篇關於民主全球化的畢業論文, 實際上是根據亨廷頓第三波的框架之下展開的一堆無離頭的東施效顰般的論述. 亨廷頓之死, 實即標誌著國際政治學的一個時代的終結. 美國的角色已由全球霸權論過渡到全球管治論, 後亨廷頓的時代, 應是全球共治的全新理論起點.

由於時間關係, 回顧亨氏的文章暫時擱置. 如各位手上還有劉軍寧翻譯的《第三波》善本, 應珍視之.

12/23/2008

《財經》為「西單民主牆」鳴冤

三十年前中國民間「思想解放」先聲,鄧小平時代第一波「反資產階級自由化」祭品,「西單民主牆」運動,沉冤三十年,首獲國內傳媒擊鼓鳴冤。

本週出版的自由派雜誌《財經》雙週刊文章,發掘出中共毛鄧兩朝「和平」更替關鍵人物葉劍英一段公開支持「西單民主牆」的金口玉言,趁此中國官方「紀念改革開放三十年」之際,彈奏出衝擊官方定論的異調,為這場因批華國鋒保守而成名,後又因批鄧小平獨裁而被鎮壓的民權啟蒙運動,踏出撥開歷史塵霧第一步。

這篇出自葉劍英之女葉向真手筆的文章披露,在被官方視為「拉開改革開放序幕」的中共十一屆三中全會的預備會議(「中央工作會議」)之閉幕講話上,葉劍英力排眾議特別為「西單民主牆」正名,以黨國領導人身份,高度評價此民權啟蒙運動:「體現了社會上的民主」。

「这次中央工作会议体现了我们党内的民主,西单民主墙体现了社会上的民主,这些民主精神都要发扬,我们要在全党、全国造成真正民主的空气,使广大干部群众精神振奋、心情舒畅。」

但這句評價,於隨後公開發布的定稿中消失無蹤,且葉劍英整個講話中,所有關涉民主人權等「有爭議」「比較敏感」問題的字句,皆遭閹棄,收入《葉選》之欽定版本,更遭多番加工,面目全非。是故,此事為官史所不載。

对于一些有争议的或者比较敏感的问题,如对“西单民主墙”的肯定、如“确实保护人民的生命、财产不受侵犯”等多处都作了删改;并删去“广大干部和群众毫无人权保障。有多少人被他们用这样那样的方法整死了,这是一个血的教训”中“人权”二字。

葉向真文章透露,講話稿定稿前,葉劍英發言肯定「民主牆」,其實遭到身邊人勸阻,但受胡耀邦力挺。

这句话涉及对当时议论颇多的“西单民主墙”的评价,叶帅身边工作人员有不同的意见。记得在12月12日晚上定稿时,还在争论。于是,叶帅指示,把胡耀邦同 志请来,听听他的意见。耀邦同志13日上午八九点钟时专门来到军科二号楼,认真阅读了讲话稿,听取了大家的意见,最后完全同意叶帅讲话稿的精神,拍板保留这段话。

文章也暗示鄧小平同期也支持「民主墙」。當時已鬥贏華國鋒的鄧小平,於變臉鎮壓「民主墙」的數個月之前,在一次不見載於《鄧選》的與外賓談話中,曾大度表示,「群眾貼大字報」是憲法權利,是「發揚民主」,「群眾有氣要讓他門出氣」。

有关群众贴大字报的问题,他指出,这是正常的现象,是我国形势稳定的一种表现。他说:写大字报是我国宪法允许的。我们没有权利否定或批判群众发扬民主,贴大字报,群众有气要让他们出气。群众的议论,并非一切都是深思熟虑过的,也不可能要求都是完全正确的,这不可怕。

文章披露,以上葉劍英講話收入《葉選》時,與支持「民主牆」言論同樣消失的,還有一段批評黨內有人聽不得「尖銳意見」的話:

「我们有些同志,嘴里也天天高喊要批评、自我批评,要谦虚、谨慎,可是,稍微尖锐的意见一来,他们的面孔就立刻拉长了。他们只会批评别人,从不批评自己,‘老虎屁股摸不得’。」

而眾所周知,不久之後,宣稱「群眾的議論」「不可怕」,但又「老虎屁股摸不得」的鄧小平,以民主牆張貼文章批其獨裁,發雷霆之怒下令封牆鎖人,將魏京生收監,一手捏碎了這場「改革開放」前曇花一現的「社会上的民主」。


12/11/2008

【轉載】《08憲章》英譯版

Charter 08

I. Foreword

A hundred years have passed since the writing of China’s first constitution. 2008 also marks the sixtieth anniversary of the promulgation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the thirtieth anniversary of the appearance of Democracy Wall in Beijing, and the tenth of China’s signing of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. We are approaching the twentieth anniversary of the 1989 Tiananmen massacre of pro-democracy student protesters. The Chinese people, who have endured human rights disasters and uncountable struggles across these same years, now include many who see clearly that freedom, equality, and human rights are universal values of humankind and that democracy and constitutional government are the fundamental framework for protecting these values.

By departing from these values, the Chinese government’s approach to “modernization” has proven disastrous. It has stripped people of their rights, destroyed their dignity, and corrupted normal human intercourse. So we ask: Where is China headed in the twenty-first century? Will it continue with “modernization” under authoritarian rule, or will it embrace universal human values, join the mainstream of civilized nations, and build a democratic system? There can be no avoiding these questions.

The shock of the Western impact upon China in the nineteenth century laid bare a decadent authoritarian system and marked the beginning of what is often called “the greatest changes in thousands of years” for China. A “self-strengthening movement” followed, but this aimed simply at appropriating the technology to build gunboats and other Western material objects. China’s humiliating naval defeat at the hands of Japan in 1895 only confirmed the obsolescence of China’s system of government. The first attempts at modern political change came with the ill-fated summer of reforms in 1898, but these were cruelly crushed by ultraconservatives at China’s imperial court. With the revolution of 1911, which inaugurated Asia’s first republic, the authoritarian imperial system that had lasted for centuries was finally supposed to have been laid to rest. But social conflict inside our country and external pressures were to prevent it; China fell into a patchwork of warlord fiefdoms and the new republic became a fleeting dream.

The failure of both “self-strengthening” and political renovation caused many of our forebears to reflect deeply on whether a “cultural illness” was afflicting our country. This mood gave rise, during the May Fourth Movement of the late 1910s, to the championing of “science and democracy.” Yet that effort, too, foundered as warlord chaos persisted and the Japanese invasion [beginning in Manchuria in 1931] brought national crisis.

Victory over Japan in 1945 offered one more chance for China to move toward modern government, but the Communist defeat of the Nationalists in the civil war thrust the nation into the abyss of totalitarianism. The “new China” that emerged in 1949 proclaimed that “the people are sovereign” but in fact set up a system in which “the Party is all-powerful.” The Communist Party of China seized control of all organs of the state and all political, economic, and social resources, and, using these, has produced a long trail of human rights disasters, including, among many others, the Anti-Rightist Campaign (1957), the Great Leap Forward (1958–1960), the Cultural Revolution (1966–1969), the June Fourth (Tiananmen Square) Massacre (1989), and the current repression of all unauthorized religions and the suppression of the weiquan rights movement [a movement that aims to defend citizens’ rights promulgated in the Chinese Constitution and to fight for human rights recognized by international conventions that the Chinese government has signed]. During all this, the Chinese people have paid a gargantuan price. Tens of millions have lost their lives, and several generations have seen their freedom, their happiness, and their human dignity cruelly trampled.

During the last two decades of the twentieth century the government policy of “Reform and Opening” gave the Chinese people relief from the pervasive poverty and totalitarianism of the Mao Zedong era and brought substantial increases in the wealth and living standards of many Chinese as well as a partial restoration of economic freedom and economic rights. Civil society began to grow, and popular calls for more rights and more political freedom have grown apace. As the ruling elite itself moved toward private ownership and the market economy, it began to shift from an outright rejection of “rights” to a partial acknowledgment of them.

In 1998 the Chinese government signed two important international human rights conventions; in 2004 it amended its constitution to include the phrase “respect and protect human rights”; and this year, 2008, it has promised to promote a “national human rights action plan.” Unfortunately most of this political progress has extended no further than the paper on which it is written. The political reality, which is plain for anyone to see, is that China has many laws but no rule of law; it has a constitution but no constitutional government. The ruling elite continues to cling to its authoritarian power and fights off any move toward political change.

The stultifying results are endemic official corruption, an undermining of the rule of law, weak human rights, decay in public ethics, crony capitalism, growing inequality between the wealthy and the poor, pillage of the natural environment as well as of the human and historical environments, and the exacerbation of a long list of social conflicts, especially, in recent times, a sharpening animosity between officials and ordinary people.

As these conflicts and crises grow ever more intense, and as the ruling elite continues with impunity to crush and to strip away the rights of citizens to freedom, to property, and to the pursuit of happiness, we see the powerless in our society—the vulnerable groups, the people who have been suppressed and monitored, who have suffered cruelty and even torture, and who have had no adequate avenues for their protests, no courts to hear their pleas—becoming more militant and raising the possibility of a violent conflict of disastrous proportions. The decline of the current system has reached the point where change is no longer optional.

II. Our Fundamental Principles

This is a historic moment for China, and our future hangs in the balance. In reviewing the political modernization process of the past hundred years or more, we reiterate and endorse basic universal values as follows:

Freedom. Freedom is at the core of universal human values. Freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of assembly, freedom of association, freedom in where to live, and the freedoms to strike, to demonstrate, and to protest, among others, are the forms that freedom takes. Without freedom, China will always remain far from civilized ideals.

Human rights. Human rights are not bestowed by a state. Every person is born with inherent rights to dignity and freedom. The government exists for the protection of the human rights of its citizens. The exercise of state power must be authorized by the people. The succession of political disasters in China’s recent history is a direct consequence of the ruling regime’s disregard for human rights.

Equality. The integrity, dignity, and freedom of every person—regardless of social station, occupation, sex, economic condition, ethnicity, skin color, religion, or political belief—are the same as those of any other. Principles of equality before the law and equality of social, economic, cultural, civil, and political rights must be upheld.

Republicanism. Republicanism, which holds that power should be balanced among different branches of government and competing interests should be served, resembles the traditional Chinese political ideal of “fairness in all under heaven.” It allows different interest groups and social assemblies, and people with a variety of cultures and beliefs, to exercise democratic self-government and to deliberate in order to reach peaceful resolution of public questions on a basis of equal access to government and free and fair competition.

Democracy. The most fundamental principles of democracy are that the people are sovereign and the people select their government. Democracy has these characteristics: (1) Political power begins with the people and the legitimacy of a regime derives from the people. (2) Political power is exercised through choices that the people make. (3) The holders of major official posts in government at all levels are determined through periodic competitive elections. (4) While honoring the will of the majority, the fundamental dignity, freedom, and human rights of minorities are protected. In short, democracy is a modern means for achieving government truly “of the people, by the people, and for the people.”

Constitutional rule. Constitutional rule is rule through a legal system and legal regulations to implement principles that are spelled out in a constitution. It means protecting the freedom and the rights of citizens, limiting and defining the scope of legitimate government power, and providing the administrative apparatus necessary to serve these ends.

III. What We Advocate

Authoritarianism is in general decline throughout the world; in China, too, the era of emperors and overlords is on the way out. The time is arriving everywhere for citizens to be masters of states. For China the path that leads out of our current predicament is to divest ourselves of the authoritarian notion of reliance on an “enlightened overlord” or an “honest official” and to turn instead toward a system of liberties, democracy, and the rule of law, and toward fostering the consciousness of modern citizens who see rights as fundamental and participation as a duty. Accordingly, and in a spirit of this duty as responsible and constructive citizens, we offer the following recommendations on national governance, citizens’ rights, and social development:

1. A New Constitution. We should recast our present constitution, rescinding its provisions that contradict the principle that sovereignty resides with the people and turning it into a document that genuinely guarantees human rights, authorizes the exercise of public power, and serves as the legal underpinning of China’s democratization. The constitution must be the highest law in the land, beyond violation by any individual, group, or political party.

2. Separation of powers. We should construct a modern government in which the separation of legislative, judicial, and executive power is guaranteed. We need an Administrative Law that defines the scope of government responsibility and prevents abuse of administrative power. Government should be responsible to taxpayers. Division of power between provincial governments and the central government should adhere to the principle that central powers are only those specifically granted by the constitution and all other powers belong to the local governments.

3. Legislative democracy. Members of legislative bodies at all levels should be chosen by direct election, and legislative democracy should observe just and impartial principles.

4. An Independent Judiciary. The rule of law must be above the interests of any particular political party and judges must be independent. We need to establish a constitutional supreme court and institute procedures for constitutional review. As soon as possible, we should abolish all of the Committees on Political and Legal Affairs that now allow Communist Party officials at every level to decide politically-sensitive cases in advance and out of court. We should strictly forbid the use of public offices for private purposes.

5. Public Control of Public Servants. The military should be made answerable to the national government, not to a political party, and should be made more professional. Military personnel should swear allegiance to the constitution and remain nonpartisan. Political party organizations shall be prohibited in the military. All public officials including police should serve as nonpartisans, and the current practice of favoring one political party in the hiring of public servants must end.

6. Guarantee of Human Rights. There shall be strict guarantees of human rights and respect for human dignity. There should be a Human Rights Committee, responsible to the highest legislative body, that will prevent the government from abusing public power in violation of human rights. A democratic and constitutional China especially must guarantee the personal freedom of citizens. No one shall suffer illegal arrest, detention, arraignment, interrogation, or punishment. The system of “Reeducation through Labor” must be abolished.

7. Election of Public Officials. There shall be a comprehensive system of democratic elections based on “one person, one vote.” The direct election of administrative heads at the levels of county, city, province, and nation should be systematically implemented. The rights to hold periodic free elections and to participate in them as a citizen are inalienable.

8. Rural–Urban Equality. The two-tier household registry system must be abolished. This system favors urban residents and harms rural residents. We should establish instead a system that gives every citizen the same constitutional rights and the same freedom to choose where to live.

9. Freedom to Form Groups. The right of citizens to form groups must be guaranteed. The current system for registering nongovernment groups, which requires a group to be “approved,” should be replaced by a system in which a group simply registers itself. The formation of political parties should be governed by the constitution and the laws, which means that we must abolish the special privilege of one party to monopolize power and must guarantee principles of free and fair competition among political parties.

10. Freedom to Assemble. The constitution provides that peaceful assembly, demonstration, protest, and freedom of expression are fundamental rights of a citizen. The ruling party and the government must not be permitted to subject these to illegal interference or unconstitutional obstruction.

11. Freedom of Expression. We should make freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and academic freedom universal, thereby guaranteeing that citizens can be informed and can exercise their right of political supervision. These freedoms should be upheld by a Press Law that abolishes political restrictions on the press. The provision in the current Criminal Law that refers to “the crime of incitement to subvert state power” must be abolished. We should end the practice of viewing words as crimes.

12. Freedom of Religion. We must guarantee freedom of religion and belief and institute a separation of religion and state. There must be no governmental interference in peaceful religious activities. We should abolish any laws, regulations, or local rules that limit or suppress the religious freedom of citizens. We should abolish the current system that requires religious groups (and their places of worship) to get official approval in advance and substitute for it a system in which registry is optional and, for those who choose to register, automatic.

13. Civic Education. In our schools we should abolish political curriculums and examinations that are designed to indoctrinate students in state ideology and to instill support for the rule of one party. We should replace them with civic education that advances universal values and citizens’ rights, fosters civic consciousness, and promotes civic virtues that serve society.

14. Protection of Private Property. We should establish and protect the right to private property and promote an economic system of free and fair markets. We should do away with government monopolies in commerce and industry and guarantee the freedom to start new enterprises. We should establish a Committee on State-Owned Property, reporting to the national legislature, that will monitor the transfer of state-owned enterprises to private ownership in a fair, competitive, and orderly manner. We should institute a land reform that promotes private ownership of land, guarantees the right to buy and sell land, and allows the true value of private property to be adequately reflected in the market.

15. Financial and Tax Reform. We should establish a democratically regulated and accountable system of public finance that ensures the protection of taxpayer rights and that operates through legal procedures. We need a system by which public revenues that belong to a certain level of government—central, provincial, county or local—are controlled at that level. We need major tax reform that will abolish any unfair taxes, simplify the tax system, and spread the tax burden fairly. Government officials should not be able to raise taxes, or institute new ones, without public deliberation and the approval of a democratic assembly. We should reform the ownership system in order to encourage competition among a wider variety of market participants.

16. Social Security. We should establish a fair and adequate social security system that covers all citizens and ensures basic access to education, health care, retirement security, and employment.

17. Protection of the Environment. We need to protect the natural environment and to promote development in a way that is sustainable and responsible to our descendents and to the rest of humanity. This means insisting that the state and its officials at all levels not only do what they must do to achieve these goals, but also accept the supervision and participation of non-governmental organizations.

18. A Federated Republic. A democratic China should seek to act as a responsible major power contributing toward peace and development in the Asian Pacific region by approaching others in a spirit of equality and fairness. In Hong Kong and Macao, we should support the freedoms that already exist. With respect to Taiwan, we should declare our commitment to the principles of freedom and democracy and then, negotiating as equals, and ready to compromise, seek a formula for peaceful unification. We should approach disputes in the national-minority areas of China with an open mind, seeking ways to find a workable framework within which all ethnic and religious groups can flourish. We should aim ultimately at a federation of democratic communities of China.

19. Truth in Reconciliation. We should restore the reputations of all people, including their family members, who suffered political stigma in the political campaigns of the past or who have been labeled as criminals because of their thought, speech, or faith. The state should pay reparations to these people. All political prisoners and prisoners of conscience must be released. There should be a Truth Investigation Commission charged with finding the facts about past injustices and atrocities, determining responsibility for them, upholding justice, and, on these bases, seeking social reconciliation.

China, as a major nation of the world, as one of five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council, and as a member of the UN Council on Human Rights, should be contributing to peace for humankind and progress toward human rights. Unfortunately, we stand today as the only country among the major nations that remains mired in authoritarian politics. Our political system continues to produce human rights disasters and social crises, thereby not only constricting China’s own development but also limiting the progress of all of human civilization. This must change, truly it must. The democratization of Chinese politics can be put off no longer.

Accordingly, we dare to put civic spirit into practice by announcing Charter 08. We hope that our fellow citizens who feel a similar sense of crisis, responsibility, and mission, whether they are inside the government or not, and regardless of their social status, will set aside small differences to embrace the broad goals of this citizens’ movement. Together we can work for major changes in Chinese society and for the rapid establishment of a free, democratic, and constitutional country. We can bring to reality the goals and ideals that our people have incessantly been seeking for more than a hundred years, and can bring a brilliant new chapter to Chinese civilization.

translated from the Chinese by Perry Link

(此譯文將刊於新一期The New York Review of Books)

【轉載】《08憲章》

08宪章

一、前言

今年是中国立宪百年,《世界人权宣言》公布60周年,“民主墙”诞生30周年,中国政府签署《公民权利和政治权利国际公约》10周年。在经历了长期的人权灾难和艰难曲折的抗争历程之后,觉醒的中国公民日渐清楚地认识到,自由、平等、人权是人类共同的普世价值;民主、共和、宪政是现代政治的基本制度架构。抽离了这些普世价值和基本政制架构的“现代化”,是剥夺人的权利、腐蚀人性、摧毁人的尊严的灾难过程。21世纪的中国将走向何方,是继续这种威权统治下的“ 现代化”,还是认同普世价值、融入主流文明、建立民主政体?这是一个不容回避的抉择。

19世纪中期的历史巨变,暴露了中国传统专制制度的腐朽,揭开了中华大地上“数千年未有之大变局”的序幕。洋务运动追求器物层面的进良,甲午战败再次暴露了体制的过时;戊戌变法触及到制度层面的革新,终因顽固派的残酷镇压而归于失败;辛亥革命在表面上埋葬了延续2000多年的皇权制度,建立了亚洲第一个共和国。囿于当时内忧外患的特定历史条件,共和政体只是昙花一现,专制主义旋即卷土重来。器物模仿和制度更新的失败,推动国人深入到对文化病根的反思,遂有以“科学与民主”为旗帜的“五四”新文化运动,因内战频仍和外敌入侵,中国政治民主化历程被迫中断。抗日战争胜利后的中国再次开启了宪政历程,然而国共内战的结果使中国陷入了现代极权主义的深渊。1949年建立的“新中国”,名义上是“人民共和国”,实质上是“党天下”。执政党垄断了所有政治、经济和社会资源,制造了反右、大跃进、文革、六四、打压民间宗教活动与维权运动等一系列人权灾难,致使数千万人失去生命,国民和国家都付出了极为惨重的代价。

二十世纪后期的“改革开放”,使中国摆脱了毛泽东时代的普遍贫困和绝对极权,民间财富和民众生活水平有了大幅度提高,个人的经济自由和社会权利得到部分恢复,公民社会开始生长,民间对人权和政治自由的呼声日益高涨。执政者也在进行走向市场化和私有化的经济改革的同时,开始了从拒绝人权到逐渐承认人权的转变。中国政府于1997年、1998年分别签署了两个重要的国际人权公约,全国人大于2004年通过修宪把“尊重和保障人权”写进宪法,今年又承诺制订和推行《国家人权行动计划》。但是,这些政治进步迄今为止大多停留在纸面上;有法律而无法治,有宪法而无宪政,仍然是有目共睹的政治现实。执政集团继续坚持维系威权统治,排拒政治变革,由此导致官场腐败,法治难立,人权不彰,道德沦丧,社会两极分化,经济畸形发展,自然环境和人文环境遭到双重破坏,公民的自由、财产和追求幸福的权利得不到制度化的保障,各种社会矛盾不断积累,不满情绪持续高涨,特别是官民对立激化和群体事件激增,正在显示着灾难性的失控趋势,现行体制的落伍已经到了非改不可的地步。

二、我们的基本理念

当此决定中国未来命运的历史关头,有必要反思百年来的现代化历程,重申如下基本理念:

自由:自由是普世价值的核心之所在。言论、出版、信仰、集会、结社、迁徙、罢工和游行示威等权利都是自由的具体体现。自由不昌,则无现代文明可言。

人权:人权不是国家的赐予,而是每个人与生俱来就享有的权利。保障人权,既是政府的首要目标和公共权力合法性的基础,也是“以人为本”的内在要求。中国的历次政治灾难都与执政当局对人权的无视密切相关。人是国家的主体,国家服务于人民,政府为人民而存在。

平等:每一个个体的人,不论社会地位、职业、性别、经济状况、种族、肤色、宗教或政治信仰,其人格、尊严、自由都是平等的。必须落实法律面前人人平等的原则,落实公民的社会、经济、文化、政治权利平等的原则。

共和:共和就是“大家共治,和平共生”,就是分权制衡与利益平衡,就是多种利益成分、不同社会集团、多元文化与信仰追求的群体,在平等参与、公平竞争、共同议政的基础上,以和平的方式处理公共事务。

民主:最基本的涵义是主权在民和民选政府。民主具有如下基本特点:(1)政权的合法性来自人民,政治权力来源于人民;(2)政治统治经过人民选择,(3)公民享有真正的选举权,各级政府的主要政务官员必须通过定期的竞选产生。(4)尊重多数人的决定,同时保护少数人的基本人权。一句话,民主使政府成为“民有,民治,民享”的现代公器。

宪政:宪政是通过法律规定和法治来保障宪法确定的公民基本自由和权利的原则,限制并划定政府权力和行为的边界,并提供相应的制度设施。

在中国,帝国皇权的时代早已一去不复返了;在世界范围内,威权体制也日近黄昏;公民应该成为真正的国家主人。祛除依赖“明君”、“清官”的臣民意识,张扬权利为本、参与为责的公民意识,实践自由,躬行民主,尊奉法治,才是中国的根本出路。

三、我们的基本主张

藉此,我们本着负责任与建设性的公民精神对国家政制、公民权利与社会发展诸方面提出如下具体主张:

1、修改宪法:根据前述价值理念修改宪法,删除现行宪法中不符合主权在民原则的条文,使宪法真正成为人权的保证书和公共权力的许可状,成为任何个人、团体和党派不得违反的可以实施的最高法律,为中国民主化奠定法权基础。

2、分权制衡:构建分权制衡的现代政府,保证立法、司法、行政三权分立。确立法定行政和责任政府的原则,防止行政权力过分扩张;政府应对纳税人负责;在中央和地方之间建立分权与制衡制度,中央权力须由宪法明确界定授权,地方实行充分自治。

3、立法民主:各级立法机构由直选产生,立法秉持公平正义原则,实行立法民主。

4、司法独立:司法应超越党派、不受任何干预,实行司法独立,保障司法公正;设立宪法法院,建立违宪审查制度,维护宪法权威。尽早撤销严重危害国家法治的各级党的政法委员会,避免公器私用。

5、公器公用:实现军队国家化,军人应效忠于宪法,效忠于国家,政党组织应从军队中退出,提高军队职业化水平。包括警察在内的所有公务员应保持政治中立。消除公务员录用的党派歧视,应不分党派平等录用。

6、人权保障:切实保障人权,维护人的尊严。设立对最高民意机关负责的人权委员会,防止政府滥用公权侵犯人权,尤其要保障公民的人身自由,任何人不受非法逮捕、拘禁、传讯、审问、处罚,废除劳动教养制度。

7、公职选举:全面推行民主选举制度,落实一人一票的平等选举权。各级行政首长的直接选举应制度化地逐步推行。定期自由竞争选举和公民参选法定公共职务是不可剥夺的基本人权。

8、城乡平等:废除现行的城乡二元户籍制度,落实公民一律平等的宪法权利,保障公民的自由迁徙权。

9、结社自由:保障公民的结社自由权,将现行的社团登记审批制改为备案制。开放党禁,以宪法和法律规范政党行为,取消一党垄断执政特权,确立政党活动自由和公平竞争的原则,实现政党政治正常化和法制化。

10、集会自由:和平集会、游行、示威和表达自由,是宪法规定的公民基本自由,不应受到执政党和政府的非法干预与违宪限制。

11、言论自由:落实言论自由、出版自由和学术自由,保障公民的知情权和监督权。制订《新闻法》和《出版法》,开放报禁,废除现行《刑法》中的“煽动颠覆国家政权罪”条款,杜绝以言治罪。

12、宗教自由:保障宗教自由与信仰自由,实行政教分离,宗教信仰活动不受政府干预。审查并撤销限制或剥夺公民宗教自由的行政法规、行政规章和地方性法规;禁止以行政立法管理宗教活动。废除宗教团体(包括宗教活动场所)必经登记始获合法地位的事先许可制度,代之以无须任何审查的备案制。

13、公民教育:取消服务于一党统治、带有浓厚意识形态色彩的政治教育与政治考试,推广以普世价值和公民权利为本的公民教育,确立公民意识,倡导服务社会的公民美德。

14、财产保护:确立和保护私有财产权利,实行自由、开放的市场经济制度,保障创业自由,消除行政垄断;设立对最高民意机关负责的国有资产管理委员会,合法有序地展开产权改革,明晰产权归属和责任者;开展新土地运动,推进土地私有化,切实保障公民尤其是农民的土地所有权。

15、财税改革:确立民主财政和保障纳税人的权利。建立权责明确的公共财政制度构架和运行机制,建立各级政府合理有效的财政分权体系;对赋税制度进行重大改革,以降低税率、简化税制、公平税负。非经社会公共选择过程,民意机关决议,行政部门不得随意加税、开征新税。通过产权改革,引进多元市场主体和竞争机制,降低金融准入门槛,为发展民间金融创造条件,使金融体系充分发挥活力。

16、社会保障:建立覆盖全体国民的社会保障体制,使国民在教育、医疗、养老和就业等方面得到最基本的保障。

17、环境保护:保护生态环境,提倡可持续发展,为子孙后代和全人类负责;明确落实国家和各级官员必须为此承担的相应责任;发挥民间组织在环境保护中的参与和监督作用。

18、联邦共和:以平等、公正的态度参与维持地区和平与发展,塑造一个负责任的大国形象。维护香港、澳门的自由制度。在自由民主的前提下,通过平等谈判与合作互动的方式寻求海峡两岸和解方案。以大智慧探索各民族共同繁荣的可能途径和制度设计,在民主宪政的架构下建立中华联邦共和国。

19、转型正义:为历次政治运动中遭受政治迫害的人士及其家属,恢复名誉,给予国家赔偿;释放所有政治犯和良心犯,释放所有因信仰而获罪的人员;成立真相调查委员会,查清历史事件的真相,厘清责任,伸张正义;在此基础上寻求社会和解。

四、结语

中国作为世界大国,作为联合国安理会五个常任理事国之一和人权理事会的成员,理应为人类和平事业与人权进步做出自身的贡献。但令人遗憾的是,在当今世界的所有大国里,唯独中国还处在威权主义政治生态中,并由此造成连绵不断的人权灾难和社会危机,束缚了中华民族的自身发展,制约了人类文明的进步——这种局面必须改变!政治民主化变革不能再拖延下去。

为此,我们本着勇于践行的公民精神,公布《零八宪章》。我们希望所有具有同样危机感、责任感和使命感的中国公民,不分朝野,不论身份,求同存异,积极参与到公民运动中来,共同推动中国社会的伟大变革,以期早日建成一个自由、民主、宪政的国家,实现国人百余年来锲而不舍的追求与梦想。

签署人:303人

于浩成(北京,法学家)
张思之(北京,律师)
茅于轼(北京,经济学家)
杜 光 (北京,政治学家)
李 普 (北京,老记者)
沙叶新(上海,剧作家)
流沙河(四川,诗人)
吴茂华(四川,作家)
张显扬(北京,思想家)
孙文广(山东,教授)
鲍 彤(北京,公民)
丁子霖(北京,教授)
张先玲(北京,工程师)
徐 珏(北京,研究员)
蒋培坤(北京,教授)
刘晓波(北京,作家)
张祖桦(北京,宪政学者)
高 瑜(北京,记者)
戴 晴(北京,作家)
江棋生(北京,学者)
艾晓明(广东,教授)
刘军宁(北京,政治学家)
张旭昆(浙江,教授)
徐友渔(北京,哲学家)
贺卫方(北京,法学家)
莫少平(北京,律师)
陈子明(北京,学者)
张博树(北京,政治学家)
崔卫平(北京,学者)
何光沪(宗教学专家)
郝 建(北京,学者)
沈敏骅(浙江,教授)
李大同(北京,记者)
栗宪庭(北京,艺术评论家)
张 鸣(北京,教授)
余 杰(北京,作家)
余世存(北京,作家)
秦 耕(海南,作家)
周 舵(北京,学者 )
浦志强(北京,律师)
赵达功(深圳,作家)
姚立法(湖北,选举专家)
冯正虎(上海,学者)
周 勍(北京,作家)
杨恒均(广州,作家)
滕 彪(北京,法学博士)
蒋亶文(上海,作家)
唯 色(西藏,作家)
马 波(北京,作家)
查建英 (北京,作家)
胡发云(湖北,作家)
焦国标(北京,学者)
李公明(广东,教授)
莫之许(北京,评论家)
李柏光(北京,法学博士)
傅国涌(浙江,作家)
马少方(广东,商人)
张 闳(上海,教授)
夏业良(北京,经济学家)
冉云飞(四川,学者)
廖亦武(四川,作家)
王 怡(四川,学者)
王晓渔(上海,学者)
苏元真 (浙江,教授)
强剑衷(南京,老报人)
欧阳小戎(云南,诗人)
刘 荻(北京,自由职业者)
昝爱宗(浙江,记者)
周鸿陵(北京,社会活动家)
冯 刚(浙江 教授)
陈 林(广州 学者)
尹 贤(甘肃,诗人)
周 明(浙江,教授)
凌沧洲(北京,新闻人)
铁 流(北京,作家)
陈奉孝(山东,北大右派学生)
姚 博(北京,评论家)
张津郡(广东,职业经理人)
李剑虹(上海,作家)
张善光(湖南,人权捍卫者)
李德铭(湖南,新闻工作者)
刘建安(湖南,教师)
王小山(北京,媒体人)
范亚峰(北京,法学博士)
周明初(浙江,教授)
梁晓燕(北京,环保志愿者)
徐 晓(北京,作家)
陈 西(贵州,人权捍卫者)
赵 诚(山西,学者)
李元龙(贵州,自由撰稿人)
申有连(贵州,人权捍卫者)
蒋绥敏(北京,工程师)
陆中明(陕西,学者)
孟 煌(北京,画家)
林福武(福建,人权捍卫者)
廖双元(贵州,人权捍卫者)
卢雪松(吉林,教师)
郭玉闪(北京,学者)
陈焕辉(福建,人权捍卫者)
朱久虎(北京,律师)
金光鸿(北京,律师)
高超群(北京,编辑)
柏 风(吉林,诗人)
郑旭光(北京,学者)
曾金燕 (北京 维权人士)
吴玉琴(贵州,人权捍卫者)
杜义龙(陕西,作家)
李 海(北京,人权捍卫者)
张 辉(山西,民主人士)
江 山(广东,业主维权者)
徐国庆(贵州,民主人士)
吴 郁(贵州,民主人士)
张明珍(贵州,民主人士)
曾 宁(贵州,民主人士)
全林志(贵州,民主人士)
叶 航(浙江,教授)
马云龙(河南,资深媒体人)
朱健国(广东,自由撰稿人)
李 铁(广东,社会活动人士)
莫建刚(贵州,自由撰稿人)
张耀杰(北京,学者)
吴报建(浙江,律师)
杨 光(广西,学者)
俞梅荪(北京,法律人)
行 健(北京,法律人)
王光泽(北京,社会活动家)
陈绍华(广东,设计师)
刘逸明(湖北,自由撰稿人)
吴祚来(北京,研究员)
高 兟(山东,艺术家)
高 强(山东,艺术家)
唐荆陵(广东,律师)
黎小龙(广西,维权人士)
荆 楚(广西,自由撰稿人)
李 彪(安徽,商人)
郭 艳(广东,律师)
杨世元(浙江,退休人员)
杨宽兴(山东,作家)
李金芳(河北,民主人士)
王玉文(贵州,诗人)
杨中义(安徽,工人)
武辛源(河北 农民)
杜和平(贵州,民主人士)
冯 玲(湖北,宪政义工)
张先忠(湖北,企业家)
蔡敬忠(广东 农民)
王典斌(湖北,企业主)
蔡金才(广东 农民)
高爱国(湖北,企业主)
陈湛尧(广东 农民)
何文凯(湖北,企业主)
吴党英(上海,维权人士)
曾庆彬(广东 工人)
毛海秀(上海,维权人士)
庄道鹤(杭州,律师)
黎雄兵(北京,律师)
李任科(贵州,民主人士)
左 力(河北 律师)
董德筑(贵州,民主人士)
陶玉平(贵州,民主人士)
王俊秀(北京,IT从业者)
黄晓敏(四川,维权人士)
郑恩宠(上海,法律人)
张君令(上海,维权人士)
杨 海(陕西,学者)
艾福荣(上海,维权人士)
杨华仁(湖北,法律工作者)
魏 勤(上海,维权人士)
苏祖祥(湖北,教师)
沈玉莲(上海,维权人士)
关洪山(湖北,人权捍卫者)
宋先科(广东,商人)
汪国强(湖北,人权捍卫者)
陈恩娟(上海,维权人士)
李 勇(北京,媒体人)
常雄发(上海,维权人士)
王京龙(北京,管理学者)
许正清(上海,维权人士)
高军生(陕西,编辑)
郑蓓蓓(上海,维权人士)
王定华(湖北,律师)
谈兰英(上海,维权人士)
范燕琼(福建,人权捍卫者)
林 辉(浙江,诗人)
吴华英(福建,人权捍卫者)
薛振标(浙江,民主人士)
董国菁(上海,人权捍卫者)
陈玉峰(湖北,法律工作者)
段若飞(上海,人权捍卫者)
王中陵(陕西,教师)
董春华(上海,人权捍卫者)
陈修琴(上海,人权捍卫者)
刘正有(四川,人权捍卫者)
马 萧(北京,作家)
万延海(北京,公共卫生专家)
沈佩兰(上海,维权人士)
叶孝刚(浙江,大学退休教师)
张劲松(安徽,工人)
章锦发(浙江,退休人员)
王丽卿(上海,维权人士)
赵常青(陕西,作家)
金月花(上海,维权人士)
余樟法(广西,作家)
陈启勇(上海,维权人士)
刘贤斌(四川,民主人士)
欧阳懿(四川,人权捍卫者)
邓焕武(重庆,商人)
贺伟华(湖南,民主人士)
李东卓(湖南,IT从业者)
田永德(内蒙,人权捍卫者)
智效民(山西,学者)
李昌玉(山东,教师)
郭卫东(浙江,职员)
陈 卫(四川,民主人士)
王金安(湖北,企业主)
察文君(上海,维权人士)
侯述明(湖北,企业主)
刘汉南(湖北,人权捍卫者)
史若平(山东,教授)
张忍祥(湖北,人权捍卫者)
野 渡(广东,编辑)
夏 刚(湖北,人权捍卫者)
赵国良(湖南,民主人士)
李智英(北京,学者)
张重发(贵州,民主人士)
陈永苗(北京,学者)
江 婴(天津,诗人)
田祖湘(贵州,民主人士)
黄志佳(湖北,公务员)
关业波(湖北,公务员)
王望明(湖北,企业主)
高新瑞(湖北,企业家)
宋水泉(湖北,法律工作者)
赵景洲(黑龙江,人权捍卫者)
温克坚(浙江,学者)
魏文英(云南,教师)
陈惠娟(黑龙江,人权捍卫者)
陈炎雄(湖北,教师)
段春芳(上海,人权捍卫者)
刘正善(云南,工程师)
关 敏(湖北,大学教师)
戴元龙(福建,企业主)
余以为 (广东,自由撰稿人)
韩祖荣(福建,企业主)
汪定亮(湖北,律师)
陈青林(北京,人权捍卫者)
钱世顺(广东,企业主)
曾伯炎(四川,作家)
马亚莲(上海,人权捍卫者)
车宏年(山东,自由撰稿人)
秦志刚(山东,电子工程师)
宋翔峰(湖北,教师)
邓复华(湖北,作家)
徐 康(湖北,公务员)
李建强(山东,律师)
李仁兵(北京,律师)
裘美丽(上海,维权人士)
兰志学(北京,律师)
周锦昌(浙江,退休人员)
黄燕明(贵州,民主人士)
刘 巍 (北京,律师)
鄢烈汉(湖北,企业主)
陈德富(贵州,民主人士)
郭用新(湖北,医生)
郭永丰(广东,中国公民监政会发起人)
袁新亭 (广州,编辑)
戚惠民 (浙江,民主人士)
李 宇(四川,采编)
谢福林(湖南,人权捍卫者)
徐 光(浙江,企业主)
野 火 (广东,自由撰稿人)
邹 巍(浙江,维权人士)
萧利彬(浙江,工程师)
高海兵(浙江,民主人士)
田奇庄(河北, 作家)
邓太清(山西,民主人士)
裴鸿信(河北,教师)
徐 民(吉林,法律工作者)
李喜阁(河南,维权人士)
王德邦(北京,作家)
冯秋盛(广东,农民)
侯文豹(安徽,维权人士)
唐吉田(北京,律师)
刘荣超(安徽,农民)
李天翔(河南,工人)
崔玉振(河北,律师)
许茂连(安徽,农民)
翟林华(安徽,教师)
陶晓霞(安徽,农民)
张 望(福建,工人)
黄大川(辽宁,职员)
陈啸原(海南,职员)
张鉴康(陕西,法律工作者)
张星水(北京,律师)
马纲权(北京,律师)
王金祥(湖北,维权人士)
王家英(湖北,企业主)
鄢来云(湖北,企业主)
李小明(湖北,维权人士)
肖水祥(湖北,维权人士)
鄢裕祥(湖北,维权人士)
刘 毅(北京,画家)
张正祥(云南,环保人士)

12/04/2008

「省港奇兵」汪洋曾蔭權

一場環球金融海嘯,似乎離奇地變成「大珠三角」加速融合的推動力,省港兩地政府在經濟哲學上率先接軌,香港特首曾蔭權的「消極不救市」,與廣東省委書記汪洋的「不救落後的生產力」,不謀而合。

各出奇謀傾儘財力救市救經濟救企業救失業,是寰球各國政府的主旋律,中國中央政府之四萬億救市大計,更搶盡風頭。迎戰金融海嘯及經濟衰退,凱恩斯主義復辟當權,經濟自由主義打入冷宮。

香港廣東兩地是此環球抗戰進程中之「逆市奇葩」,羅湖橋內外,「資本主義」香港與「社會主義市場經濟」廣東,攜手堅守碩果僅存的「自由經濟」堡壘。

兩地數以萬計中小企業因出口萎縮及銀根緊縮而陷入財困,港商集中的東莞,廠商競相倒閉,失業工人之維權工潮此起彼伏,省港兩地政府仍拒絕「救死扶傷」。

香港政府怠於出手援助扶持中小企,源於冷漠與無能。民意壓力下,曾特首雖有出招,但是無招似有招,口惠而實不至,敷衍了事,莫管死活。

在廣東,無懼民意壓力胸懷宏圖大計的汪書記,視金融海嘯災劫為物競天擇之考驗,送來淘汰「落後的生產力」,助力珠三角產業升級的曆史機遇。

「現在大家都很關心廣東經濟遇到的困難,很多人都在發表議論,讓人有天塌了的感覺。比如,有人說,今年以來廣東有5萬多家企業倒掉了!數據是否真實另當別論,但大家要認真分析一下,現在倒閉的是什麼企業,有著名的大企業嗎?沒有!我判斷,這些企業總體上講,都是落後的生產能力。」(廣州日報)

負責鎮守「世界工廠」中國兩大主要「廠區」之一珠三角的汪洋直言:「不救落後的生產力」。

一句「不救落後的生產力」,使此前發起「思想解放運動」,以豪言「殺出一條血路」一鳴驚人的中共新生代政治明星汪洋,再次人氣急升。

但有傳媒指出,汪洋之樂觀,需要動用操控新聞輿論,指揮省內傳媒報喜不報憂來配合。

《明報》文章稱,廣東當局「下令禁止省內媒體渲染結業和裁員事件,許多真實的問題因此被過濾或淡化,脫離公眾視線。」

也有輿論觀察到,對廣東經濟形勢之判斷及對策,中央與廣東,貌合神離。

廣東的經濟有多差?企業倒閉和工人失業的問題有多嚴重?這是中央高層近期非常關注的問題,京城媒體也作了不少報道和評論,間接點出了廣東官員報喜不報憂、淡化金融危機對珠三角出口企業的衝擊。(明報)

上月,總理溫家寶視察廣東,要求地方政府「努力解決中小企業發展中的突出問題」,溫總一走,廣東高官重申「鼓勵珠三角地區的中小企業加快向東西北地區轉移」。

珠三角工廠倒閉潮重災區東莞的最高官員劉志庚稱:「東莞的產業轉型原先可能需要10年時間,但這場危機加速了我們的調整步伐。」

11/23/2008

《炎黃春秋》堅挺

保守派興師問罪大軍壓境,《炎黃春秋》老將當關,寸土不讓。

被傳遭江澤民下令整肅的中共自由派雜誌《炎黃春秋》,頂住保守派妖風大作,咬緊牙關逆流而上,堅守自由派編輯路線不動搖。

該刊編輯部及身後支持者團結一致不向惡勢力低頭,雜誌領導核心社長杜導正豪言擲地有聲:我絕不後退一步」

雜誌主編吳思保證,雜誌大膽敢言風骨不墜,文革及趙紫陽等敏感事件敏感人物,照碰不誤。

似有示威意味,《南華早報》稱,日前才付印的十二月號《炎黃春秋》,趙紫陽大名將再現,而且出現四次,於一篇回憶1978年教育改革的主打文章中。

杜導正強調,迎戰保守派,不是《炎黃春秋》獨撐危局,不是他一個人孤軍奮戰,雜誌背後,還有一幫憂國憂民力主改革的「老同志」共同進退。

"If they want to fight, let the fight go on ... it is a contest of strength," he said. "It is like a game of chess, it’s interesting to watch what the next step is." (Asia Times Online

《炎黃春秋》守土之戰,正邪鬥法,勝負未分。

11/15/2008

江澤民密令鎮壓自由派雜誌

纏黑紗垂哀容出席黨政軍元老追悼會,顫顫巍巍向前輩或同輩「老同志」遺體鞠躬送別,中國官方傳媒中之江澤民形象,風燭殘年,老態龍鍾。

本月月初現身軍方元老蕭克追悼會的江澤民,上周被揭下達密令整肅受蕭克庇護的黨內自由派雜誌《炎黃春秋》。

從風燭殘年老態龍鍾退位元首,到金睛火眼殺氣騰騰言論殺手,全退四年,八十二歲的江澤民君威乍洩,寶刀未老。

整肅久享盛譽的中共自由派元老喉舌《炎黃春秋》人事,是江澤民下台以來,權威公開報導所見,其人罕有的幾次展示餘威,幕後幹政的政治行動之一,也是首次對傳媒下手。

披露整肅行動,立場親胡溫的《亞洲週刊》,並未直接點名江澤民,僅稱之為「中南海一位前主要領導人」:

「《炎黃春秋》雜志刊登八九之後有關趙紫陽的首篇正面報道專文,引起中南海一位前主要領導人不滿,要求一位政治局常委嚴肅處置。」

其後,《炎黃春秋》副社長楊繼繩對自由亞洲電台證實整肅行動並承認,所謂「中南海一位前主要領導人」,即為「三點水」(隱指江澤民)。

至於執行江澤民「嚴肅處置」聖旨的「一位政治局常委」,《亞洲週刊》雖未點名,但主管意識形態的李長春,昭然若揭,此人也一向被視為江派心腹大將。

整個整肅行動,江澤民下令,李長春指揮,文化部執刀。

江澤民一出手,《炎黃春秋》與中宣部多年對峙角力下勉力維持的脆弱均勢,頓時岌岌可危,編輯部靈魂核心人物,新聞界自由派老將杜導正楊繼繩等人一旦被清洗出局,言論防線勢必一潰千里,刊物名存實亡。《亞洲週刊》稱,《炎黃春秋》背後的「已退下高位的一批老干部」吹響護刊救亡集結號。

《炎黃春秋》之為中國傳媒中之「特權階層」,有「特權」而無自由,其「言論特權」來自政治權力庇護,來自各方妥協默契,則如今維護「言論特權」,捍衛「言論特區」,也非訴諸政治角力一途不可,當中沒有法律及司法置喙之餘地。

當前,胡錦濤「科學發展觀」學習活動鋪天蓋地,江澤民「三個代表」棄如敝履打入冷宮,江澤民此時出招,在意識形態領域翻江倒海,令人關注,《炎黃春秋》之命運,是成為兩派惡鬥新戰場,隨波逐流,抑或遭兩派聯手鎮壓,為安度明年「六四」二十週年敏感關口未雨綢繆。

11/07/2008

奧巴馬創世紀 環球報章頭版